"Balyoz" davasının sonuçlarına halkımızdan tepki geldi. Ama bunun yanında, az sayıda beraatler bir savcının gözüne fazla gözükmüş, "onları da cezalandıralım" diyor!
Cezaların babalık, kocalık ve hatta emeklilik hakkının reddi gibi aksesuarlarla süslenmiş olması da bu sürece ayrı bir sevimlilik katıyor.
Şimdi Ergenekon davaları devam ediyor. Bakalım daha ne eğlenceler hazırlıyorlar bize demokratik hukuk devletimiz!
Basından Balyoz kararlarını protesto görüntüleri, Ankara, İzmir ve İstanbul
Göstericiler
artık askerlerimizi daha bir yürekten savunuyorlar. Çağlayan mitinginin
iyimser havasında söylenen "ne takunya ne postal" sözleri o kadar
popüler değil. Hatta 27 Mayıs hatırası "Ordu Millet Elele" sloganı bile
naftalinlerden çıkartılmış. Bakın İşçi Partisi ile yakın ilişkili Aydınlık gazetesi ne diyor:
Aydınlık, 23 Eylül 2012
Güzel de atı alan Üsküdar'ı geçti. Aslında bu mahkemeler çok daha hafif cezalar, çok daha fazla beraat verseydi hükümet- ve arkasındaki "cemaat"- yine de iyi bir gol atmış olacaktı. "Darbe" ve "darbecilik" söylemini kamuoyu altşuuruna o kadar etkili bir şekilde yerleştirdiler, kendi "darbe" tanımları üzerine o kadar o kadar iyi bir konsensus yarattılar ki TSK'nın "Cumhuriyeti Kollama ve Koruma" görevini tamamen suç kapsamına sokmayı başardılar. Dikkat ederseniz savunmalar hep "hayır, biz hiç darbe filan düşünmüyorduk", "benim haberim yoktu", "o benim imzam değil", "benim emrim dışında yapıldı" şeklinde yapıldı. (Sakın yanlış anlamayın, sahte delil üretilmediğini söylemiyorum!) Ortalıkta uçuşan polemiklerin net sonucu şudur: siyasi süreçle ilgili olarak askerden gelebilecek herhangi bir hamle, hareket, tavır, söz, ima tabu haline gelmiştir. Bunun böyle olmasının zeminini AKP ve "cemaat"'ten önce aydınlar (ki aydın demek bizde genelde solcu demekti) hazırlamıştı.
"Darbeci" sıfatını artk bir küfür haline getirmeyi başardılar. Bu sorgulanmaz hâle geldi. Siyah pantolon altında beyaz çorap giymek gibi, balık yemeğiyle kırmızı şarap içmek gibi.
Peki, Genelkurmay başkanı Necdet Özel'e niçin kızıyorsunuz o zaman? Tam istediğinizi yapmıyor mu? Yoksa kendinize "darbeci" dedirtmeden darbe mi getirmek istiyorsunuz? İstemediğiniz hükümeti göndersin, siz beş sene sonra, ortalık yatıştığında, onu da "darbeciler yargılansın" diye kurtlara atın, hem de temiz bir vicdanla!
Belki de eveleyip gevelemek, polemiklerde boğulmak yerine kullandığınız kelimelere ve cümlelere dikkat etmek en iyisi. Vaktiyle "inkilap" ve "ihtilâl" kelimelerini "devrim" kelimesinde birleştirerek bir solcu ihtilâli ("devrimi") daha kabul edilir hâle getirme stratejisi vardı. En azından böyle gözüküyordu.
O hâlde AKP ve "yandaş basın"'ın kurduğu kelime tuzağını tersine çevirin, "darbe" ile "askeri müdahele"'yi ayırın.
Bakın 28 Şubat'a bile "darbe" dediler ve o süreçte rol alanlara da "darbeci" yaftası yapıştırtdılar, yargılıyorlar
Darbe kelimesini bir rejimi değiştirmek için yapılan bir hareket sayarsanız, bir rejimi korumak, ciddi bir tehlikeden kurtarmak için son çare olarak yapılacak bir harekete meselâ askeri müdahele derseniz (bir hastalığa "müdahele"edileceği gibi)
O zaman dabeciler AKP ve arkasındaki "cemaat" olur, asker de darbe yapmamış, yapılmış olan darbeye müdahele etmiş olur.
ENGLISH
The footnote links do not
work; you will have to scroll down to to the footnotes for expanded
information. Opening the blogsite on two seperate windows and keeping
one on the footnotes will make it easier to go back and forth. Sorry for
the inconvenience, I'm no expert!.
Other links should work.
Other links should work.
There was public reaction to the Balyoz ("Sledgehammer") verdicts. But on the other side of the coin, an attorney for the persecution was unhappy with the 34 acquittals. He feels they got off too lightly.
Another cute embellishment of the verdicts was that the condemned officers lose their conjugal rights as husbands, paternity rights as fathers, and retirement benefits.
So much for the "Sledgehammer", now on with the Ergenekon trials. Life is so much fun in this democratic state under rule of law.
Photos from the press, demonstrations against the "Sledgehammer" verdicts in Ankara, Izmir and Istanbul. The banner carried by the Istanbul group (below) reads "Army, People, Hand in Hand"
The demonstrators are now defending our soldiers more
openly. The slogan "no clogs, no boots" from the optimistic Çağlayan
demonstration is now pretty much forgotten.[1]
Even the slogan “Army and People Hand in Hand”, relic of May 27th, 1960,[2]
has been taken out of mothballs and put into circulation. Just take a look at
this headline below, which appeared in Aydınlık,
a left-leaning newspaper affiliated with the Labor Party.
Aydınlık, Sept. 23rd, 2012:
"A People without an Army is Nothing"
Great, but is it too little too late? When it gets down
to it, even if the courts had been more lenient, even if they had passed out a
great deal more acquittals, the AKP and the “community”[3]
behind it would have carried the day. They have so indelibly burned in the stereotypes
of “coup” and “putschist” into the public subconscious, created such a
concensus based on their own definition of what constitutes a “coup”, that it
has become a crime for the Armed Forces to carry out its duty of “protecting
and watching over” the Republic. Notice that the accused of the "Sledgehammer"
trials often sought to defend themselves with expressions like “no, we weren’t
plotting a coup”, “I don’t know anything about it”, “that’s not my signature”, “such
and such was done contrary to my orders” etc. (Please do not misunderstand me,
I am not saying the evidence was not
forged because I do believe that this was often the case.) The net result of all the
battle of words flying back and forth has been that any action, movement,
attitude, phrase, suggestion coming from the military is now taboo! And the groundwork for all of
this was laid out by the intellectuals (and “intellectual” usually means “left
wing” in our country) well before the AKP and the “community” entered the
scene.
“Putschist” is now a swear word! Supporting a “coup” is
unacceptable bad taste, like white socks under black trousers, or red wine with
fish. It’s just not done!
Fine then, why this rage against Chief of Staff Necdet
Özel? Isn’t his passivity just what you wanted? Or do you want a “coup”,
without seeming to support it? Do you want him to unseat a government that you
dislike so that, when the waters calm down five years hence, you can throw him
to the wolves, shouting “try the putschists”?[4]
And still have a clear conscience about it?
Maybe you should give up on all the wordplay and say exactly what you intend to say, paying
attention to the words you pick, and what they mean.
In the heyday of the leftist movement, the words ihtilâl (“revolution”) and inkilâp (“reform”) were united in one
word, devrim[5]. Many suspected, and with reason, that
this was a linguistic trick to make the expected leftist revolution more
palatable.
The AKP and its press has been using a similar trick
of nomenclature to guide our thinking and actions. Just undo it, and split the
word "coup" into two, corresponding to two meanings.
Notice that the AKP and its supporting press has even
managed to label the 28th of February process a “coup” and the officers
involved are now standing trial for it.[6]
If a “coup d’état” is a drastic action to change
a regime, a last-resort act to protect it can, and indeed ought to be, called
an intervention.
Like a medical intervention.
Under the revised definition, the AKP and the “community”
behind it will certainly appear as the “putschists”, the ones to have planned
and carried out their “coup d’état”. And the public will be within its rights to
expect and hope for an “intervention” to remedy the state of affairs.
[1] The
Çağlayan rally of April 29th, 2007 was the biggest of the monster
demonstrations against the rise to power of a fundamentalist government. The
AKP was already in power, with Erdoğan as Prime Minister. The AKP was
using its parliamentary majority to bring a fundamentalist from their own ranks
to the Presidency; making the takeover of the top offices of the Republic
complete. The demonstrations were held to keep this from happening. The government had its way and
like-minded Abdullah Gül became president.
There are several videos of the Çağlayan meeting, on U-Tube, here is one:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cC9lw3rUF_Ae
There are several videos of the Çağlayan meeting, on U-Tube, here is one:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cC9lw3rUF_Ae
“Clogs” (“takunya”)
is a derogatory allusion to the simple footwear associated with a sloppy
fundamentalist image; “boots” alludes to military boots. Feeling overconfident
in their own crowd, the demonstrators were declaring they did not want a military intervention.
Many organizers of the rallies have later found
themselves entangled in the Ergenekon
trials.
[2] In the
days leading up to the coup of May 27th, 1960, the protesting youth the armed
forces, with the support of the opposition CHP, joined forces to bring down
the right-wing government of Adnan Menderes’ Democratic Party. Unlike the
interventions of 1970 and 1980, it had more the character of a “coup d’état”.
The arrmy enjoyed open public support and the slogan “Army and People Hand in
Hand” was a popular chant.
[3] “Community”-
“cemaat”, the followers of Fethullah Gülen,
spiritual leader of his own sect, based on the teachings of Muslim mystic Said
Nursi. Fethullah Gülen is resident in a ranch in Pennsylvania.
[4] Like
General Evren, now being tried at 95 years of age for the intervention of Sept.
12, 1980.
[5] Within
the framework of “purifying” the language from words of Arabic and Persian
origin.
[6] See
footnote 6 of my post “War Drums of a Non-Militarist Government”, Sept. 18th.